|
|
Graminoid Quarterly - May 2008 Volume 1 Number 1
This is a quarterly field office newsletter designed to bring you the latest information on happenings in the world of grazing lands management. All offices are encouraged to submit articles about grazing and grass lands management activities, adaptation, cultural and management techniques, etc. Please submit articles to Rick Caquelin. Direct inquiries to Jon Siddoway, Rangeland Management Specialist, USDA NRCS Montana State Office, Federal Building., Room 443, 10 East Babcock Street, Bozeman, MT 59715-4704, Phone 406-587-6790, Fax 406-587-6761. Upcoming Range Events and Activities: Mark Your Calendars!June 9-13 Range Health Training - Upper Missouri Area Gras“s”-ping for Grazingland Information – Try these Links!Montana State University Extension Field Office 2008 Seed Collection ListThe Plant Materials (PM) Program is requesting seed collections of 7 species in Montana and Wyoming. In 2008, continued collection is requested of Pediomelum argophyllum (synonym Psoralea argophylla), large Indian breadroot Pediomelum esculentum (synonym Psoralea esculenta), slimflower scurfpea Psoralidium tenuiflorum (synonym Psoralea tenuiflora), scarlet globemallow Sphaeralcea coccinea, prairie thermopsis Thermopsis rhombifolia and American vetch Vicia americana. New to the list this year is the Montana state grass, bluebunch wheatgrass Pseudoroegneria spicata. When scouting around for likely sites in which to make seed collections, look for populations of healthy plants growing in harsher than normal conditions. Specific guidelines for seed collecting can be found in an online technical note at the websites mentioned below. Collections are needed from all areas of Montana and Wyoming. A bulletin will be distributed electronically to each field office in Montana and Wyoming to provide guidance on accessing the seed collection instructions via each state’s homepage. For immediate access to the respective guidance documents, species descriptions, and photos, go to the Montana or Wyoming NRCS homepage and click on Plant Materials, and then the Seed Collection List. Seed is subsequently planted in evaluation studies to test performance and utility for solving conservation problems outlined in the Plant Materials Long-Range Plans for Montana and Wyoming. By Jim Jacobs, Plant Materials Specialist Prairie Grass Nutrients on the MapRanchers need information about the amount and nutritional value of forage plants growing in their pastures. Now a foundation has been laid for a system that will allow them to get detailed Web-based information about available forage material in their fields. Researchers analyzed commercial HyMap hyperspectral imagery taken by airplane to estimate the yield and protein content of two markedly different North Dakota ecoregions. The technique’s accuracy was the same for both regions: 82 percent for yield predictions and 92 percent for protein content. An important feature of this technology is the ability to measure the quantity and quality of both live and dead plant material, which is rarely possible using conventional remote-sensing technologies. In this region, cold weather hinders plant decomposition and cattle get protein from dead and live grasses. By combining this technology with prior calculating methods, the researchers were able to compute and map the nutritional value of entire pastures in northern prairie grasslands. But further research is needed to determine whether the results apply in other regions. Article courtesy of Agricultural Research – March 2008. Rebecca Phillips, USDA-ARS ECS 3 – Beware of Your AnswerThe form MT-ECS-3 was developed a couple of years ago as a tool for planners to use as an initial assessment of program eligibility to determine if the feed and forage was balanced on the rangeland or pastureland acres included in an Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) application. This tool was not developed for use by planners if they had the field conditions and time to develop a feed/forage balance from data gathered in the field. The ECS-3 should not be used as a substitute for developing a feed/forage balance for producers who do meet the 120% threshold and need a range inventory for prescribed grazing – clipping and estimating forage production on site is still required to develop a grazing strategy or plan and meet the requirements of the prescribed grazing 528 standard. I would encourage anyone who intends to use the ECS-3 to read the instructions prior to utilizing this tool (and become more familiar with the 528 standard and specification). I would also like to forewarn planners that even though it appears someone may meet the 120% requirement (the producer has a stocking rate that is no more than 20% greater than the recommended stocking rate), please take a closer look at the fields or pastures that have been addressed for the feed/forage balance calculations. If the acreage within the pastures is not even sizes there is a possibility that livestock may be in some of the larger pastures too long. As an example if there are three pastures, one is 500 acres, another is 700 acres and the third is 1900 acres, and each has an intial stocking rate of about .25 Animal Unit Months (AUM)/acre this means that there are 125 available AUMs in the first field, 175 AUMs in the second field and 475 AUMs in the third field. If the producer has a herd of 200, 1200 pound cows with calves (1.3 AUE or 260 AUs)) and has been using these three fields from June through August each year, how long could he be in each field (assuming 100% grazability, water well-distributed in the pasture, etc): Field 1 – 125 AUMs / 260 AUs = .48 months or about 14 days Field 2 – 175 AUMs / 260 AUs = .67 months or about 20 days Field 3 – 475 AUMs / 260 AUs = 1.83 months or about 55 days Even though it appears his feed/forage is balanced for these 3 months, there should be a red flag raised in every planner that 55 days in one field is too long – there is too much opportunity for grazing regrowth if conditions are applicable and changing season of use in a rotation becomes difficult. However, this does point out to the planner that a cross fence may be a viable facilitating practice to resolve this issue with a grazing strategy that would minimize grazing regrowth and change season of use over a 3 – 4 year period (and possibly a water development depending on the situation) – something the planner could discuss with the producer. If the producer does not want to pursue the facilitating practices and is not willing to change the management of the herd, it would be best to tell the producer that we can’t pursue any cost-shared practices at this point in time because resource concerns would not be adequately addressed or resolved. Also of importance is checking the stocking rates which have been assigned to mapping unit symbols on the ECS-3 worksheet – these values in some cases can be too high and will give erroneous results (can show feed/forage being balanced or nearly so when in fact the opposite is true for the pastures in question). By Jon Siddoway, State Rangeland Management Specialist Reduce Livestock Losses to Poisonous PlantsSpring is fast approaching and soon livestock will be moved to spring and summer pastures. One common poisonous plant on mountain and foothill ranges that is often overlooked is weedy milkvetch (astragalus miser). It affects cattle, sheep, and horses. The crude protein content of this plant is relatively high, but it also synthesizes miserotoxin, a glycoside that causes acute and chronic poisoning in ruminants. Weedy milkvetch poisoning may be mistaken for larkspur poisoning. Early signs of poisoning may include finding animals that are gaunt or slightly bloated with some respiratory abnormalities and general lethargy. With continued exposure to the plant these signs will progress to acute poisoning. Signs of acute poisoning include loss of hindquarter co-ordination, excessive salivation, irregular gait, reluctance to move, a strong tendency to become recumbent, and respiratory difficulty which causes a roaring or wheezing sound. Death may follow prolonged grazing with the animal becoming emaciated and weak. In chronic poisoning, there is permanent damage manifested as unthriftiness, diarrhea, loss of stamina, and clicky heels. According to a recent study conducted in British Columbia, Canada chronic poisoning signs were often delayed and became evident once the animals were suddenly exerted and forced to travel. Affected animals may lag behind as the livestock are moved. Weedy milkvetch has very small pea-like leaves and grows about six inches tall in tufts. The flowers are very small, about one centimeter in length, and pea like. The color varies from light blue to purple with a purple pointed tip on the keel petal. The plant is typically found under or in association with Douglas fir or lodgepole pine. The recent Canadian study conducted over a six-year period found that cattle raised in the area with a known history of exposure to weedy milkvetch were able to tolerate the plant much more than cattle not familiar with weedy milkvetch. First and second calf heifers had the greatest incidence of poisoning. The study also found that supplementing with molasses protein blocks reduced poisoning from 25 cases without the supplement to 2 cases with the supplement. In general good grazing management that promotes healthy plant communities will reduce the amount of weedy milkvetch that exists on the range, and the opportunity for livestock poisoning. If you identify this plant on your range, avoid introducing non-native grazing animals and/or provide a molasses protein block to help with weedy milkvetch detoxification. By Matt Ricketts, Area Range Specialist Plant of the Quarter - Bluebunch Wheatgrass, Pseudoroegneria SpicataThe full article is available at University of Saskatchewan Taxonomy Key Identification Characteristics Ecological & Physiological Relations Management Considerations Article submission by Matt Ricketts, Area Range Specialist Article by Sheryl Harrison, Student at University of Saskatchewan If you encounter any problems with the file provided on this page, please contact Technical Resources at 406-587-6822. The following document is available for print in
Adobe Reader format. < Back to Range and Pasture Publications Last Modified: 08/19/2008 |
|
|
|